Learner Reviews & Feedback for Probabilistic Graphical Models 1: Representation by Stanford University
About the Course
Top reviews
CP
Jan 15, 2020
Simply excellent. A wonderful course to begin the representation of PGM. Be advised.... this can get quite advanced. It's all about that Bayes, 'bout that Bayes.... no trouble.
CC
Mar 24, 2020
really great course! very clear and logical structure. I completed a graphical models course as part of my master's degree, and this really helped to consolidate it
301 - 314 of 314 Reviews for Probabilistic Graphical Models 1: Representation
By Sami J
•Apr 22, 2020
Material is interesting but needs updating. Programming assignments have been marked as "Honors Assignments", which is a thinly veiled attempt to shirk responsibility for fixing bugs and providing student support. Quiz questions are vaguely worded. Overall the course is challenging, but only sometimes for the right reasons.
By Shen C
•Jul 14, 2020
this course is a very difficult one. takes a lot of time and effort. forum is really useful (i wouldn't have passed without it). that said, it is also because there is little help from the lecturer and instructors. would appreciate more help.
By Siavash R
•Aug 10, 2017
For me this was a difficult course not because of the material, but because of the teaching style. I don't think Dr. Koller is a very good teacher.
By Xingjian Z
•Nov 2, 2017
Fun topic. But the explanation of the mentor is somewhat vague and the material is sometimes outdated and misleading.
By Ujjval P
•Dec 13, 2016
Concepts covered in quiz and assignments are not covered well in the lecture videos, can be much better.
By Jonathan K
•Jan 25, 2018
Interesting and useful material, but I found the lecturer unengaging.
By Michel S
•Jul 14, 2018
Good course, but the material really needs a refresh!
By Robert M
•Feb 6, 2018
Started off well. Finished poorly
By tegh s
•Dec 28, 2025
I have learn a lot throughout the course. The content is quite niche. It is hard find good resources for the content else where.
That said there were a couple of issues.
- The submit_configuration file needs to be modified due to programming errors for MATLAB
- Programming assignments should be given in Python not MATLAB
- To make the assignments more clear it would be good if you had video on how to test the code students submit before submitting. Week 3 is quite confusing.
By Aswin T
•Sep 10, 2020
Very rigid questions, very theoretical. Very poor instructor support. Content needs to be improved. Very disconnected approach.
By Deleted A
•Jun 11, 2020
very shallow explanation of important concepts
By Shan-Jyun W
•Jun 24, 2017
Lectures are awful.
By Belal M
•Sep 8, 2017
A very dry course.
By Javier G
•Aug 4, 2020
Muy malo